I am a native
Appalachian. My ancestors were Appalachians for as far back as I know anything
about. My grandmother was born in what is now the Great Smoky Mountains
National Park, and my great-great grandfather is buried there. I don’t know if
being so immersed in a culture is a help or hindrance to understanding its
flaws.
I grew up listening to
my grandparents’ “country talk.” I noticed even when I was young how different it
was from what I heard on TV. My mother spoke less in that style, and I even
less. Thaller seems to suggest that we expose kids to a multilingual education,
both standard English and Appalachian English. I’m torn on the idea. I would
like that old way of speech to be preserved, but as an historic artifact. I can’t
see how a child’s education is enhanced by teachers modeling Appalachian
speech. Maybe the kids are more comfortable talking that way, but I don’t
believe education is about making people comfortable. Being fluent in standard
English is important to the kids’ success outside the valleys and ridges of
Appalachia.
The article mentions
the creativity of the Appalachian culture, referring to the Appalachian people
as more “right-brained” than “left-brained.” She mentions quilting and other
handicrafts. I’m not sure that I buy her theory. I can’t see that we are any
more creative as a whole than other cultures. I sure don’t want students’
educations to revolve around trying to work artistic creations into every
subject. Students should learn the same math curriculum that students outside
Appalachia learn. Relating math to the perceived Appalachian culture by
designing world problems about quilting and moonshining isn’t going to help
students better learn math.
Thaller also discusses
teaching students about the physical geography of the place they live in order
to be better caretakers of the land. I agree with that. I’m blown away by the
amount of local people in East Tennessee that don’t know we have a world-famous
national park in our back yards. But they do know about Dollywood.
Thaller also mentions
that many kids are educated to move away from home. She says that more kids
should be educated with an eye toward staying in rural Appalachia and improving
the situation there. That’s far easier said than done. Until there are
opportunities for educated students at home, most will move away. I don’t think
there will be many opportunities until more stay. It’s a vicious cycle.
Finally, Thaller
speaks against “blaming the victim.” I disagree. The Appalachian people are
responsible themselves for the sorry state of education in the region. It’s not
the fault of “greedy corporations” or stereotyping from outsiders. Most of the
problem is due to the culture of Appalachians. A large portion of Appalachians
see no value in education. There is even a distrust of highly educated people.
Until that changes, education will continue to be in a sad state, and poverty
rates will continue to be high.
No comments:
Post a Comment