b) Consider your CSEL intervention case study. Are there tools
from a behaviorist view for either encouraging productive behaviors or
discouraging undesirable behaviors that you could apply to the case? What are
they? Conversely, how might self-efficacy and self-regulation contribute to the
intervention plans you use in your case study?
Lydia Zeller
Blog #8
March 31, 2014
Case Study: Middle School – Cherie
As a teacher, I face behaviors to Cherie’s frequently. I
find positive reinforcement to be a good tool in increasing or decreasing
particular behaviors. I use a variety of reinforcers in my classroom. One is a
piece of candy; another is verbal praise, free seat Friday, having class
outside one day, etc. I use these to encourage on task behavior, getting homework
done, team/group activities (like a winning team from a game); almost anything
can be encouraged. Also, by treating good behaviors this way it encourages
others to behave this way. I see less off task behaviors when the students are
working towards something; especially when the something is having class
outside.
I try not to use negative reinforcement in my class room.
However, I am guilty of an example from our text. Sending a student to the
office – often they want to go and so it rewards them when they are sent there.
However, sometimes it is inevitable; I must keep a good learning environment. I
have before kept students in my room because they wanted to leave. I have felt
guilty because it seems like a cheap shot for me (I didn’t like the satisfaction
I got from keeping them where they did not want to be). However, I also do not
want them to have the bad behavior reinforced to get what they want. I also
take the rewards from the positive reinforcement section away which I would say
is considered negative reinforcement. If the students earned working with a
partner instead of by themselves but are too loud or not getting work done, I
switch the assignment back to individual. (I do not take away without warning).
This is taking away a stimulus which is negative reinforcement.
Self Efficacy – To me it appears Cherie is doing these behaviors
as an attention strategy from her peers and the adults. From a self efficacy
view point, she may not believe she can behave properly. I would try positive
reinforcement with her. After a conversation one-on-one, we could work out a
system of reward. For example, “if you are good all week I will let you take
the attendance to the office each day next week”. Hopefully, I can encourage
her good behavior to show her she is capable of proper behavior. Another
reinforcer I could use would be to let her come eat lunch with me. If she is
truly craving attention that may be a reward she will find worth working
towards.
Self Regulation – Cherie may be struggling with self regulation
because one of her other needs is not being met. Like I mentioned earlier, I
believe she is craving attention whether it be adult or peer related. To work
with her on self regulation, giving her small tasks to work toward earning
would be a good start. Once she can do the smaller tasks, I would increase the
difficulty or length of each goal. This will take time but hopefully she will
gain the self regulation needed to not need my help.
No comments:
Post a Comment